ThinkCivics News
An educated citizenry is a vital requisite
for our survival as a free people.
Join ThinkCivics+
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
Join ThinkCivics+
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
Join TC+
Home Health

A New York Times Reporter Claims Americans Distrust the Government’s COVID-19 Advice Because They Don’t Understand How Science Works

Reason.com by Reason.com
August 23, 2021
in Health
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
0
A New York Times Reporter Claims Americans Distrust the Government’s COVID-19 Advice Because They Don’t Understand How Science Works

Many Americans do not have much faith in the government’s COVID-19 advice, which has changed repeatedly during the pandemic, often for questionable reasons. It has not helped that local, state, and federal public health officials have defended their positions with disingenuous arguments or misrepresented the scientific evidence.

A survey conducted last spring by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that just 52 percent of Americans had “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of trust in recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Other public health authorities had even lower ratings: 44 percent for local health departments, 41 percent for state health departments, 40 percent for the U.S. surgeon general, 37 percent for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and 33 percent for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for example.

New York Times health and science reporter Apoorva Mandavilli thinks she has identified the problem: Americans do not understand how the scientific process works. “To frustrated Americans unfamiliar with the circuitous and often contentious path to scientific discovery, public health officials have seemed at times to be moving the goal posts and flip-flopping, or misleading, even lying to, the country,” she writes in a “news analysis.”

To the extent that government messaging can be blamed for the lack of public trust, Mandavilli argues, it is because officials have failed to clearly explain that COVID-19 science is constantly evolving, justifying changes in policy that might seem arbitrary and confusing. “Health officials have not acknowledged clearly or often enough that their recommendations may—and very probably would—change as the virus, and their knowledge of it, evolved,” she says. “Is it really so surprising, then, that Americans feel bewildered and bamboozled, even enraged, by rapidly changing rules that have profound implications for their lives?”

There is some truth to this. Emerging evidence concerning the especially contagious delta variant and the possibility that vaccine effectiveness wanes over time, for example, has given rise to lively debates about the merits of new masking guidelines and booster shots. Evidence that face masks play an important role in reducing virus transmission, which was pretty meager early in the pandemic, has been reinforced by more recent studies, although it is still not strong enough to persuade many skeptics, including some who are familiar with the scientific literature.

But Mandavilli completely overlooks other factors that help explain why so many Americans are disinclined to accept the government’s guidance as gospel. Public health advice is not simply a function of science. It incorporates cost-benefit analyses and value judgments on which well-informed people of good faith can honestly differ. Whether “universal masking” in schools makes sense, for instance, depends not only on the uncertain evidence that it prevents outbreaks but on the weight one assigns to the burdens that policy imposes. It also depends on what level of risk is deemed tolerable.

In this case and others, it often seems that public health agencies are working backward, settling on a policy and then searching for evidence to back it up. Anyone who delves into the studies that the CDC cites to justify its recommendation that everyone 2 or older wear face masks in schools and other public settings, regardless of their vaccination status, can see that science is just one element of the agency’s deliberative process.

The CDC’s initial dismissal of general mask wearing as a precaution against COVID-19 likewise was clearly influenced by nonscientific considerations—in particular, the concern that the practice would aggravate a shortage of masks for health care workers. The agency’s reversal of that position in April 2020, although supposedly justified by evolving evidence, officially was driven mainly by concerns about asymptomatic transmission, a danger that had been recognized for months. And while the CDC’s double reversal of its mask advice to vaccinated Americans was based on concerns about a new development—the proliferation of the delta variant, coupled with evidence that vaccines are less effective at preventing infection by it—there was legitimate disagreement about the merits of both shifts.

As far as Mandavilli is concerned, the CDC has simply been following the science all along, a point that Americans are too ignorant to recognize. “One jarring backtrack was the mask guidance by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” she writes. “The agency said in May that vaccinated people could drop their masks, advice that helped set the stage for a national reopening. Officials did not emphasize, or at least not enough, that the masks could be needed again. Now, with a new surge in infections, they are.” Mandavilli thus takes as a given the very point that critics of the CDC’s latest guidance contest.

State policy likewise has been driven by scientifically questionable reasoning. After California banned outdoor restaurant dining in late 2020, the state’s health secretary admitted the policy was not based on evidence that the newly prohibited activity posed a significant risk of virus transmission. The real aim, he said, was to discourage Californians from leaving home.

Around the same time, San Mateo County Health Officer Scott Morrow, an early advocate of lockdowns in the San Francisco Bay Area, complained that there was little rhyme or reason to the new restrictions imposed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, which ultimately delivered no perceptible public health benefit. “I am aware of no data that some of the business activities on which even greater restrictions are being put into place with this new order are the major drivers of transmission,” Morrow said. “I’m not sure we know what we’re doing.”

Morrow, a physician with a public health degree who has been San Mateo County’s health officer since 1992, presumably cannot be accused of misunderstanding how science works. His complaint was that California’s policies were not justified by the evidence.

The distrust provoked by disingenuous arguments and empirically shaky policies has been compounded by official statements with no basis in fact. Early in the pandemic, then–Surgeon General Jerome Adams flatly asserted that face masks “are NOT effective in preventing [the] general public from catching #Coronavirus.” After the CDC changed its advice on masks, public health officials erred in the opposite direction. Last fall, in his zeal to promote face masks as “the most important, powerful public health tool we have,” then–CDC Director Robert Redfield claimed they offered more effective protection than vaccines would. The current CDC director, Rochelle Walensky, has grossly exaggerated the risk of outdoor transmission and the danger posed by breakthrough infections, blatantly mischaracterizing the scientific evidence.

Americans should be able to rely on public health officials for accurate summaries of COVID-19 research. Episodes like these suggest they can’t, which is at least as big a problem as the public’s lack of appreciation for scientific uncertainty.

Mandavilli likewise blames the public rather than the government for the skepticism inspired by the FDA’s delay in fully approving COVID-19 vaccines. Today the FDA finally gave full approval to Pfizer’s two-dose COVID-19 vaccine, eight months after it granted an emergency use authorization. “Some holdouts found it suspicious that the vaccine was not formally approved yet somehow widely dispensed,” Mandavilli  writes. “For them, ’emergency authorization’ has never seemed quite enough.”

But surely it was reasonable to wonder why the FDA—despite expressing confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines and allowing millions of injections, which generated reams of data to supplement the evidence from clinical trials—waited so long to address the concern that Mandavilli seems to view as frivolous. While full approval may not persuade committed anti-vaxxers, it could have made a decisive, potentially lifesaving difference for many waverers. If the delay led to avoidable COVID-19 deaths, the FDA bears some responsibility for that outcome.

Mandavilli does fault “health officials” for failing to take “full advantage” of their ability to counteract COVID-19 “misinformation,” which she says offered “a powerful opportunity to fill in the knowledge gaps for many Americans.” But while rebutting misinformation certainly is preferable to suppressing it through government-encouraged censorship, there is always a danger that health officials themselves will err, evincing unjustified confidence and mistaking their own opinions for incontrovertible fact.

Mandavilli, for example, thinks it’s a fact that universal masking is “needed,” which implies that people who disagree are disseminating misinformation. That attitude is hardly consistent with the epistemological modesty that seems appropriate in light of the scientific uncertainty she emphasizes.

This article was originally published on Reason.com. Read the original article.

Reason.com

Reason is the nation’s leading libertarian magazine. They produce hard-hitting independent journalism on civil liberties, politics, technology, culture, policy, and commerce.

reason.com/
Tags: CDCcoronavirusEpidemicsFDAMedia CriticismNew York Timespublic healthpublic opinionScience

Related Posts

Shock Video: ‘Covid Critical’ ‘To Legitimize Total Biometric Surveillance’

Shock Video: ‘Covid Critical’ ‘To Legitimize Total Biometric Surveillance’

May 25, 2022
Documents from 2021 int’l security exercise showed monkeypox bio attack on May 15, 2022

Documents from 2021 int’l security exercise showed monkeypox bio attack on May 15, 2022

May 23, 2022

Belgium Begins Monkeypox Quarantines, Biden Warns “Everybody Should Be Concerned”

May 22, 2022

‘Imagine The Compliance’: Pfizer CEO Pitches Davos Elites On WiFi Microchip Pills

May 21, 2022
Load More
Next Post
Dire Polling for Democrats Shows Voters Fleeing Them in Droves

Dire Polling for Democrats Shows Voters Fleeing Them in Droves

Embassy Staffers in Kabul Accuse US of Betrayal, Say They Prefer Taliban Bullets to Hell at Airport

Embassy Staffers in Kabul Accuse US of Betrayal, Say They Prefer Taliban Bullets to Hell at Airport

Biden’s Afghanistan Disaster Shows He’s More Bystander Than World Leader, in Over His Head

Biden’s Afghanistan Disaster Shows He’s More Bystander Than World Leader, in Over His Head

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

  • Protesters block, attack truck and horse trailer, driver runs them over

    Protesters block, attack truck and horse trailer, driver runs them over

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Unvaccinated People Will Be Barred From This, Starting May 31

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Watch As Nancy Pelosi Has Meltdown During Live Interview To Roe v. Wade Question

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Five Most Devastating (and Sickening) Things to Come Out of The Uvalde Shooting Press Conference

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Report: Police Got Own Kids Out of School While Subduing Other Uvalde Parents

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

WHO withdraws 12 Biden ‘sovereignty’ amendments amid fierce opposition

by ThinkCivics Newswire
May 27, 2022
0
WHO withdraws 12 Biden ‘sovereignty’ amendments amid fierce opposition
National Security

Amid charges of ceding U.S. sovereignty to the World Health Organization, 12 of the 13 amendments submitted by the Biden administration...

Read more

Newly obtained memo shows John Kerry was conducting ‘secret’ meetings with Iran during the Trump administration

by ThinkCivics Newswire
May 26, 2022
0
Newly obtained memo shows John Kerry was conducting ‘secret’ meetings with Iran during the Trump administration
National Security

This article was originally published on Twitchy.com. Read the original article.

Read more

Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation

by The Federalist
May 19, 2022
0
Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation
National Security

Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann is currently on trial for lying to the FBI about his role in pushing...

Read more

Jankowicz Got The Boot, But Biden’s ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Hired Replacements Are WORST

by ThinkCivics Newswire
May 19, 2022
0
Jankowicz Got The Boot, But Biden’s ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Hired Replacements Are WORST
National Security

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) hired the co-author of the PATRIOT Act, arguably the harshest crackdown on civil liberties...

Read more
The Sinister Roots of Build Back Better
Economy

The Sinister Roots of Build Back Better

by American Thinker
May 26, 2022
0

President Joe Biden and the puppeteers who control his teleprompter are weakening the country in order to gain more power...

Read more
Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States
Economy

Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States

by Zero Hedge
May 24, 2022
0

As World Economic Forum head Klaus Schwab proclaimed that “the future is built by us” at the opening of the...

Read more
This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect
Economy

This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect

by RedState
May 23, 2022
0

It’s the time of year again when thousands of the world’s most powerful and wealthy people gather in Davos, Switzerland...

Read more
Is Trump A Modern Day Nostradamus? Watch His Prediction Of What Would Happen If Biden Won
Economy

Is Trump A Modern Day Nostradamus? Watch His Prediction Of What Would Happen If Biden Won

by The Political Insider
May 23, 2022
0

President Trump is many things, to friend and foe alike. Is being a modern day Nostradamus among them? At least...

Read more
Facebook Twitter RSS

Brilliantly

SAFE!

thinkcivics.com

Content & Links

Verified by Sur.ly

2022

Recent News

  • Chicago Police Hunt for Man Who Allegedly Pointed Gun at News Crew during Report on Gun Violence
  • Major Companies Line Up to Fund Abortion Tourism after Roe
  • ‘License to Lie’: Prosecutors Claim Sussmann Felt Entitled to Manipulate FBI in Closing Argument

Category

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Faith
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • Military
  • National Security
  • Politics
  • Science & Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • US News
  • Videos
  • World News

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Login
  • Sign Up
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • Join
  • Contribute

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.