• Login
thinkcivics.
Subscribe
Join Us
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
No Result
View All Result
tc.
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
Subscribe
Join Us
No Result
View All Result
thinkcivics.
Home Technology

The Bipartisan ‘Endless Frontier Act’ Increases Tech Research Spending to $100bn Annually to Outcompete Communist China

Will this aggressive bipartisan effort put us into a position to reclaim dominance in leading the world in science and technology?

Keefer Novik by Keefer Novik
March 24, 2021
in Technology, Editorials
Reading Time: 6min read
0
0
The Bipartisan ‘Endless Frontier Act’ Increases Tech Research Spending to $100bn Annually to Outcompete Communist China

President Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in the Oval Office earlier this month. Credit: The White House

Article Table of Contents hide
1 Key Takeaways
2 The Transformation
3 In Favor of Revamping the Agency for the Future
3.1 Making the Argument This is Not the Right Path
4 Why This Matters

Key Takeaways

  • A rare bipartisan effort to bolster our competitiveness with China aggressively seeks to transform the National Science Foundation (NSF).
  • The bill seeks to increase the NSF budget to $100 billion a year over five years.
  • Critics argue the Act would distract and detract from the traditional work the NSF is essential for. Proponents say the Act would set up a barrier between the traditional directives and the new.

The Endless Frontier Act was introduced in the 116th Congress last year by Senators Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) and Todd Young (R-IN). Along with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Mike Gallagher (R-WI) in the House.

Our work relies on the support of readers like you. Please consider supporting us at PayPal or Patreon, to help sustain our journalism.

A rare bipartisan effort to bolster our competitiveness with China aggressively seeks to transform the National Science Foundation (NSF). The first major overhaul of the independent agency since its inception by Congress in 1950. The NSF annual budget flows through a variety of universities and American colleges.

Get Our Weekly Newsletter and Get Smarter

Receive a weekly recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

We agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

The NSF budget request on their brochure to Congress is an estimated 7.8 billion. They estimate that amount will support 8,100 new research projects. Fueling big ideas such as “New knowledge such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, nanotechnology, gravitational waves, and resilient infrastructure.”

The Transformation

Senator Schumer (D-NY) is hard at work with colleagues across the aisle this year to reintroduce the bill. The aim is to transform the National Science Foundation into the National Science and Technology Foundation (NSTF). With a new directive,

“to establish a regional technology hub program, to require a strategy and report on economic security, science, research, and innovation, and for other purposes.”

The ultimate purpose for the legislation being the assertion that our leadership position in these high-tech areas is being eroded. Evidenced that,

“The United States once led the world in the share of our economy invested in re-search, our Nation now ranks 9th globally in total research and development and 12th in publicly financed research and development.”

All aimed towards China, the bill seeks to increase the NSF budget to $100 billion a year over five years. This money channeled towards an assortment of previously stated university-led research centers, testbeds, and consortia. 

The new technology directive would mirror to a degree the Defense of Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This would allow its program managers to drive toward targeted research and development outcomes. As it stands, the NSF currently uses external peer review of grant proposals to steer its programs.

Other goals of the bill include improving education in key technical areas, in layman’s terms, translating the R&D research into viable processes and products available to the government and public for consumption and use.

Will this aggressive bipartisan effort put us into a position to reclaim dominance in leading the world in science and technology?

In Favor of Revamping the Agency for the Future

MIT President Rafael Reif has argued in strong favor of The Endless Frontier Act. He opens with the question,

“Is the United States’ science and technology enterprise currently configured and funded to meet the challenge posed by China?”

He challenges that the question has not received enough attention from policy-makers. He makes a good point in saying that we have focused too much on weakening China rather than strengthening the United States. 

The Census of China leading in 5G technology is a prime example, Reif argues, is a significant marker of America falling behind. He admits the bill itself alone may not be enough but states,

“critically, the Endless Frontier Act would boost the kind of research needed in key fields where we face stark competition.”

Critics argue the Act would distract and detract from the traditional work the NSF is essential for. Proponents such as Reif say the Act would set up a barrier between the traditional directives and the new.

“The bill would, after all, assign an additional mission to NSF,” says Reif, “the bill makes clear that NSF’s traditional work is to continue, and the bill rightly creates a wall between the new and existing directorates.”

Making the Argument This is Not the Right Path

Patrick Windham, a former Senate staff member, joined two science policy scholars to voice their perspective that this is not the best course. They offer a different view instead of the proposed legislation that is forthcoming.

One thing they do agree with is that America’s leadership in technological innovation is no longer assured. They also agree that “government investments in advanced technologies are good for the United States.”

They ask if the new money generated from the bill is “really the most effective way to develop and commercialize new technologies?” The main pushback is if university research is the best key driver of US technology development and commercialization.

University research alone by itself seemingly may not translate into commercial use or innovative products by itself. As Windham presents, “universities are not equipped to undertake large applied engineering projects, much less to translate the resulting new technologies into products and processes.”

They use, as an example, the efforts in the 1990s to identify “critical technologies” and how those efforts failed. It is difficult to predict which technologies will be the most valuable in the future. Also, R&D funding priorities “inevitably become political, as groups and leaders vie to have their favorites supported.”

The alternative idea is to let agencies scan for the latest and newest innovations. Once identified, “then agency leaders and, for big initiatives, the White House and Congress vet these ideas and decide which to support.”

They advocate to let the NSF continue being the NSF without transformation. The confusion of the bill, as mentioned before, would create DARPA-like managers who would supervise projects with our peer review while still directing that they may use peer review. How would specific projects know what path to take?

Windham and his colleagues’ ultimate conclusion is that a separate entity would benefit from the same directives. There is no need to transform the NSF and expand support for manufacturing institutes to be ready for new technologies to emerge from the equation’s R&D side.

Why This Matters

Both sides of this issue have merit. However, it’s most important to say we go after and fund future innovation the American way. Let’s advocate for research and development that extends to the general public.

Total reliance upon the government to extend and expand our technological governance is shameful at best when thinking of American ingenuity. Americans are some of the best-known inventors and entrepreneurs in history. The freedom of our country gives rise to the likes of electricity and beyond.

We must look at other policies that seek to damage the middle America, the small business owner, and the likes. The public will ultimately take what these institutions and bodies that Congress creates to new levels.

The public will take these institutions to new heights and lengths and depths that the government cannot imagine. The freedoms we enjoy we must protect and so that America’s bright minds will rise and create.

Yes, this is a bipartisan effort, but how much of our political spectrum is not? Everything else seemingly is contested now. Two fundamental ideas are divided into how we feel and honor our constitution. 

Read this: Democrats Pressure Major Service Providers to Censor Free Speech and Misinformation

Will this new endeavor survive if the left democrats get their way eventually and turn our nation into a socialist totalitarian regime?

It is a brief, flickering hope that the two major parties will reunite and work together for the American people’s best. We must not forget that ordinary people are the real backbone of innovation and life in America.

We must set our eyes on the bigger picture; either way, this legislature will present itself in 2021, and everyone must decide if this is the best course of action.

Keefer Novik

Keefer is passionate about America and the Gospel of the Kingdom of God. His writings focus on the intersectionality of faith and culture.

endlessartistic.art.blog/
Tags: Charles EChinaCongressMike GallagherNational Science FoundationRo KhannaSchumerThe Endless Frontier ActTodd Young

Related Posts

Nominee For HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra Testifies Before Senate Committee

Tarheel State Turmoil: The 2022 Senate Battleground

April 16, 2021
Bitcoin Ban Practically Impossible and Governments Would Be ‘Foolish’ to Try: SEC Commissioner

Bitcoin Ban Practically Impossible and Governments Would Be ‘Foolish’ to Try: SEC Commissioner

April 14, 2021

Hispanic Culture Clashes with Leftist Activists Over ‘Latinx’

April 14, 2021

Amazon’s Twitch Bans Users Based on Undisclosed ‘Hate Group’ List

April 13, 2021
Load More
Next Post
Israel election: Netanyahu falls short of majority amid vote count

Israel election: Netanyahu falls short of majority amid vote count

Homebuyer mortgage demand inches higher, but rates hit highest level since summer

Homebuyer mortgage demand inches higher, but rates hit highest level since summer

North Korea Conducts 1st Missile Test Under Biden Administration

North Korea Conducts 1st Missile Test Under Biden Administration

Staff Editorials

Nominee For HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra Testifies Before Senate Committee
News & Politics

Tarheel State Turmoil: The 2022 Senate Battleground

by Seth Palmer
April 16, 2021
Hispanic Culture Clashes with Leftist Activists Over ‘Latinx’
Culture & Society

Hispanic Culture Clashes with Leftist Activists Over ‘Latinx’

by Josh Herrington
April 14, 2021
Governor Brian Kemp Tours Delta Mass Vaccination Site
Culture & Society

Georgia Corporations Cave to Activists On Voter ID Law. Republicans Hit Back Where It Hurts.

by Michael Price, MPA
April 9, 2021
Close Up Of Boxing Gloves
News & Politics

Now Is The Time for America to Make Room for a Third-Party. Voters Deserve Better!

by Samantha DeTurk
April 5, 2021
Vaccine Passports Pose Privacy and Discrimination Concerns Says Health Experts and Digital Privacy Advocates
Health & Science

Vaccine Passports Pose Privacy and Discrimination Concerns Says Health Experts and Digital Privacy Advocates

by Michael Price, MPA
March 29, 2021

Recommended

President Trump Participates In American Workforce Policy Advisory Board Meeting

Kinzinger Finds Himself a Target in GOP Loyalty War

4 weeks ago
Gov. DeSantis Slams Controversial ’60 Minutes’ Segment About Vaccine Distribution: ‘They Don’t Believe In Facts’

Gov. DeSantis Slams Controversial ’60 Minutes’ Segment About Vaccine Distribution: ‘They Don’t Believe In Facts’

1 week ago
Close Up Of Boxing Gloves

Now Is The Time for America to Make Room for a Third-Party. Voters Deserve Better!

2 weeks ago
1 Investor With 1 Share Can Call Out Corporate Leftism

1 Investor With 1 Share Can Call Out Corporate Leftism

2 weeks ago

Categories

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
No Result
View All Result

Highlights

Ernst Will Introduce Bill To Prevent Planned Parenthood From Profiting Off Biden’s Title X Decision

How Biden Administration Redefines Words, Reshapes Facts to Serve Its Purpose

76 Non-Military, Non-Law Enforcement Federal Agencies Stockpile Weaponry

Marjorie Taylor Greene Challenges AOC To A Debate On The Green New Deal

After Fauci Calls Tucker’s Vaccine Questions A ‘Conspiracy Theory,’ He Asks: ‘What Are You Telling Us?’

House and Senate Democrats Propose Bill to Expand the Supreme Court

What's New

Nominee For HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra Testifies Before Senate Committee
News & Politics

Tarheel State Turmoil: The 2022 Senate Battleground

by Seth Palmer
April 16, 2021
0

When the United States Senator Richard Burr signaled during the 2016 election that it would be...

Trump is gone, but land disputes along the border continue under Biden.

Trump is gone, but land disputes along the border continue under Biden.

April 16, 2021
These 107 Corporations Signal Opposition to Election Integrity

These 107 Corporations Signal Opposition to Election Integrity

April 16, 2021

Ernst Will Introduce Bill To Prevent Planned Parenthood From Profiting Off Biden’s Title X Decision

April 16, 2021
How Biden Administration Redefines Words, Reshapes Facts to Serve Its Purpose

How Biden Administration Redefines Words, Reshapes Facts to Serve Its Purpose

April 16, 2021
Facebook Twitter Instagram RSS

Follow us on social media:

About ThinkCivics

We research, examine, and report on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption. Our reports are not presented in confusing academic or political language, we speak Main Street English.

Recent News

  • Tarheel State Turmoil: The 2022 Senate Battleground
  • Trump is gone, but land disputes along the border continue under Biden.
  • These 107 Corporations Signal Opposition to Election Integrity

Category

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World

© 2021 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Login
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • ThinkCivics Plus
  • Contribute

© 2021 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.