ThinkCivics News
An educated citizenry is a vital requisite
for our survival as a free people.
Join ThinkCivics+
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
Join ThinkCivics+
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
Join TC+
Home US News Elections

California recall reality: Newsom could be replaced by candidate with far fewer votes

ThinkCivics Newswire by ThinkCivics Newswire
August 22, 2021
in Elections
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
0
California recall reality: Newsom could be replaced by candidate with far fewer votes

For weeks, legal scholars have debated whether the recall election of Gov. Gavin Newsom could be found unconstitutional if Newsom failed to realize a “no recall” majority of the ballots cast and was ousted by a candidate who received fewer votes than he did.

Although it’s impossible to predict how courts will rule, many experts say the current recall process has long survived legal challenges, and probably would again, even if a fringe candidate won on Sept. 14 and became governor with a minority of overall votes.

That view is based on court decisions on election law, especially rulings stemming from the recall election of Gov. Gray Davis, when voters removed Davis in 2003 and replaced him with Arnold Schwarzenegger, a popular actor who went on to win reelection.

In that case, more people voted for Schwarzenegger than Davis so the candidate with the most votes won. Even so, California’s recall scheme permits a candidate with fewer votes to prevail over an incumbent, as was demonstrated by the state’s last successful recall of an elected legislator.

In 2018, voters recalled Sen. Josh Newman (D-Fullerton). On the recall question, 41.9% voted to retain Newman. On the second ballot question, in which voters are asked to select a successor, a Republican won with only 33.8% of the vote. An incumbent who faces a recall is not permitted to be named as a successor candidate on the second part of the ballot.

“Maybe I should have been reinstated,” joked Newman, after reading a recent essay by legal scholars who helped spark the current debate by arguing that California’s recall law violated the federal Constitution.

Newman was in fact reinstated — but by voters, not the courts. He booted the Republican who beat him in the recall in 2020 and now serves in Sacramento.

His ouster was one of 179 recall attempts of state officials in California since 1913. Eleven qualified for the battle. Of those, six incumbents, including Newman and Davis, were ousted and replaced with other people running on the same ballot.

Unlike in 2003, when Davis faced a recall vote, the attempted removal of Newsom has stirred few court challenges by recall foes.

Constitutional law scholar Vikram D. Amar, who closely followed the litigation during the Davis recall, said the failure of most lawsuits probably discouraged attempts this time.

“Maybe people got the message,” said Amar, law school dean of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign campus, “and thought, ‘What is the point?’”

In their essay in the New York Times — and a subsequent one Friday in the Los Angeles Times — UC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and law and economics professor Aaron S. Edlin argued that California’s recall law was unconstitutional because the incumbent could be replaced with a candidate who received fewer votes. The scholars said that violated a federal constitutional principle that every voter should have an equal ability to influence an election result.

Judging by polls, the professors predicted with “virtual certainty that if Newsom is recalled, he will get far more votes — probably more than twice as many — as whoever would replace him.”

“This makes no sense and violates the most basic notions of democracy,” they argued in the Los Angeles Times.

But when a prominent constitutional lawyer representing Gov. Davis made this provocative assertion before the California Supreme Court in 2003, it failed, Amar noted. The court rejected the challenge and the equal protection argument.

The challenge sought to delay the election to allow Davis to appear with others in the second ballot question listing replacement candidates. That would have allowed Davis to remain governor if he obtained a plurality of the votes.

Amar said courts have long permitted rules that limit ballot access as long as they are reasonable and not overtly discriminatory.

“California’s voting process might be unwise or needlessly confusing, but it is not unconstitutional in the way critics have recently charged,” wrote Amar and University of Michigan constitutional law professor Evan Caminker this month on an online forum for legal commentary.

Still, the California Supreme Court’s rulings on several anti-recall lawsuits during the Davis recall did not create precedent. They came in the form of decisions on whether to take up the lawsuits. At the time, six of the seven justices were Republican appointees. Today five of the seven were appointed by Democrats.

Chemerinsky, in an interview, said he believed the law was unconstitutional but agreed that courts could decide that the recall proposal itself amounted to a separate election from the second question on the replacement candidates. That would likely defeat the equal protection challenge. Federal courts, he also noted, have been reluctant to involve themselves in elections.

In the L.A. Times essay, the UC Berkeley scholars argued the challenge should be brought directly to the California Supreme Court as soon as possible and the court should be asked to rule that if Newsom wins the plurality vote, he should be succeeded by the lieutenant governor until the end of the term.

That would be a bold move by the state’s highest court, whose justices face voters to be retained to 12-year terms.

Without court intervention, it would require a two-thirds vote of the Legislature or a signature campaign to place a measure on the ballot to change California’s recall law, which allows for the ouster of judges as well as legislators and governors.

That is because the recall right is enshrined in the state Constitution, placed there by voters in 1911 as a way to remove corrupt office holders.

Still, Chemerinsky said, some change must be made to “increase the difficulty” of holding recalls.

“Otherwise we are going to see a real increase in this,” he said. He noted that in the last two decades, a governor and a judge have been recalled.

During the Davis recall, the only lawsuit the California Supreme Court partially supported was a challenge of the requirements for potential replacement candidates to get on the ballot. The original constitutional requirement made it more difficult for people to be listed as candidates to replace a recalled incumbent, but the rules were substantially weakened by a later amendment and legislation.

It would not take a constitutional amendment to revise those requirements.

Then Chief Justice Ronald M. George wanted to delay the Davis recall election until the court reviewed a legal challenge of the requirements to be listed as a successor candidate.

“The chaos, confusion, and circus-like atmosphere that has characterized the current recall process undoubtedly has been brought about in large measure by the extremely low threshold …for potential candidates to qualify for inclusion on the ballot to succeed to the office of Governor,” George wrote in a dissent to the court’s refusal to take up the matter.

Then-Justice Carlos R. Moreno, at the time the court’s only Democratic appointee, agreed with George.

The Newsom recall is being challenged in federal court on equal protection grounds by Los Angeles civil rights lawyer Stephen Yagman, who unsuccessfully brought suit against the Davis recall too. Legal scholars said the suit was unlikely to succeed. “I think the suit is a loser in part because it was brought too late,” said UC Davis law school professor Christopher S. Elmendorf.

Amar, who spent much of his legal career in California, doubted that all the criticism of the recall process that Democrats and some legal scholars are now voicing will lead to actual reform after the election. The recall of Davis prompted similar calls for reform, but the recall law remains intact, he said.

“These things aren’t sexy, and they don’t have a constituency behind them,” Amar said. “You are not going to win an election by doing these really mundane, housekeeping things.”

Of the myriad court challenges during 2003, only one changed the law, Amar said. A federal judge struck down a requirement that voters had to vote on the recall question to be able to vote on the successor candidates.

But another challenge briefly put the Davis recall election in doubt. A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the election had to be delayed because of error-prone punch-card voting machines in some places. Eight days later, a larger and more conservative 9th Circuit panel overturned that decision.

Amar believes the delay caused by the court actually hurt Davis and that Newsom would face a similar backlash from any court-ordered delay now.

“Those eight days cost Gray Davis the momentum he had going into that period,” Amar said. “No one knew whether there would be a recall election.”

This article was originally published by LATimes. Read the original article.

ThinkCivics Newswire

ThinkCivics researches, examines, and reports on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption.

thinkcivics.com
Tags: CaliforniaGavin Newsom

Related Posts

The 2024 GOP Ticket That Will Win in Key Swing States

The 2024 GOP Ticket That Will Win in Key Swing States

July 3, 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court is Taking Up a Major Case on Election Integrity — And Democrats are Already Panicking

The U.S. Supreme Court is Taking Up a Major Case on Election Integrity — And Democrats are Already Panicking

July 1, 2022

South Carolina Rep. In Leaked Audio Strategizes “Sleepers” And “Dope Money” To Finance Senate Campaign

June 29, 2022

Poll: Dem enthusiasm for midterms spikes sharply following Dobbs ruling

June 28, 2022
Load More
Next Post
Tensions grow and ceasefire ends as Israel bombs sites in Gaza following violent protests

Tensions grow and ceasefire ends as Israel bombs sites in Gaza following violent protests

Veterans group and other volunteers are using intel to help Afghan interpreters flee to safety

Veterans group and other volunteers are using intel to help Afghan interpreters flee to safety

Empathizer-in-chief exposed as a lie

Empathizer-in-chief exposed as a lie

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

  • American Heart Association issues warning on mRNA vaccines

    American Heart Association issues warning on mRNA vaccines

    2 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • WATCH: Biker kicks car, then what happens next is priceless

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dem Strategists Get Clocks Cleaned After ‘Report’ About Ron DeSantis Is Debunked by Journalists

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • WATCH: Joey Chestnut Takes Down Protester Before Winning Hot Dog Eating Contest

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Whistleblower: Nearly 50,000 Medicare patients died soon after getting Vaccine

    1 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

‘Zero Trust in Our Government’: Spouse of WNBA Player Jailed in Russia Blasts Biden Administration

by ThinkCivics Newswire
June 22, 2022
0
‘Zero Trust in Our Government’: Spouse of WNBA Player Jailed in Russia Blasts Biden Administration
National Security

Joe Biden's ineptitude knows no bounds. As Obama famously said, "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*ck things up." So it's...

Read more

State Dept ‘racial equity’ czar said white colleagues too ‘protective of US, lack ‘humility, empathy’

by ThinkCivics Newswire
June 21, 2022
0
State Dept ‘racial equity’ czar said white colleagues too ‘protective of US, lack ‘humility, empathy’
National Security

A 2020 podcast episode with Desirée Cormier Smith resurfaced after the U.S. State Department appointed her on Friday to serve...

Read more

More countries looking at nuclear weapons programs because of Russia

by Hot Air
June 21, 2022
0
More countries looking at nuclear weapons programs because of Russia
National Security

Over the past year, we have seen multiple nations including the United States conducting tests of their nuclear-capable weapons delivery...

Read more

22 Democrats who voted against extra security for SCOTUS justices approved it for themselves after Jan 6

by ThinkCivics Newswire
June 15, 2022
0
22 Democrats who voted against extra security for SCOTUS justices approved it for themselves after Jan 6
National Security

Ahead of the highly anticipated decision that could overturn Roe v Wade, the House passed a bill on Tuesday to...

Read more
3 Reasons To Use Store Financing for Furniture
Economy

3 Reasons To Use Store Financing for Furniture

by ThinkCivics News Staff
July 6, 2022
0

Buying new furniture can get expensive, especially when you’re trying to furnish an entire room. Many furniture stores offer their...

Read more
Red States Leave Blue States Eating Their Economic Dust in the Post-Pandemic World
Economy

Red States Leave Blue States Eating Their Economic Dust in the Post-Pandemic World

by RedState
July 5, 2022
0

Red states –those that lean Republican—are performing better economically and gaining more residents than blue states, where economic performance lags...

Read more
A Rare Paradigm Shift With Huge Implications… 5 Reasons Why It’s Imminent
Economy

A Rare Paradigm Shift With Huge Implications… 5 Reasons Why It’s Imminent

by ThinkCivics Newswire
July 5, 2022
0

Although many don’t realize it, interest rates are simply the price of money. And they are the most important prices...

Read more
Karine Jean-Pierre Throws Hissy Fit at Jeff Bezos for Blasting Bidenomics
Economy

Karine Jean-Pierre Throws Hissy Fit at Jeff Bezos for Blasting Bidenomics

by RedState
July 3, 2022
0

Welp, this one started out bad — and quickly swirled down the White House personal-attack toilet. Zillionaire Amazon founder and...

Read more
Facebook Twitter RSS

Brilliantly

SAFE!

thinkcivics.com

Content & Links

Verified by Sur.ly

2022

Recent News

  • Chris Rufo leaves Marc Lamont Hill SPEECHLESS with perfect response to racist question
  • AZ GOP Candidate Drops Amazing Ad on Second Amendment That Has Dems Fuming
  • The Mother of All Ads Drops After Gavin Newsom Burns Money Attacking Ron DeSantis

Category

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Faith
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • Military
  • National Security
  • Politics
  • Science & Tech
  • US News
  • Videos
  • World News

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • Join
  • Contribute

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.