• Login
thinkcivics.
Subscribe
Join Us
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
No Result
View All Result
tc.
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
Subscribe
Join Us
No Result
View All Result
thinkcivics.
Home News & Politics

Greenwald: House Democrats, Targeting Right-Wing Cable Outlets, Are Assaulting Core Press Freedoms

Democrats' justification for silencing their adversaries online and in media -- "they are spreading fake news and inciting extremism" -- is what despots everywhere say.

ThinkCivics Newswire by ThinkCivics Newswire
March 2, 2021
in News & Politics
Reading Time: 9min read
0
0
Greenwald: House Democrats, Targeting Right-Wing Cable Outlets, Are Assaulting Core Press Freedoms

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 15: U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) (C) makes brief remarks before signing the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump with (L-R) Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Val Demings (D-FL), Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX), Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) in the Rayburn Room at the U.S. Capitol January 15, 2020 in Washington, DC. The House of Representatives voted to approve the managers and send the articles of impeachment to the Senate, where Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said the trial will begin next Tuesday. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Not even two months into their reign as the majority party that controls the White House and both houses of Congress, key Democrats have made clear that one of their top priorities is censorship of divergent voices. On Saturday, I detailed how their escalating official campaign to coerce and threaten social media companies into more aggressively censoring views that they dislike — including by summoning social media CEOs to appear before them for the third time in less than five months — is implicating, if not already violating, core First Amendment rights of free speech.

Our work relies on the support of readers like you. Please consider supporting us at PayPal or Patreon, to help sustain our journalism.

Now they are going further — much further. The same Democratic House Committee that is demanding greater online censorship from social media companies now has its sights set on the removal of conservative cable outlets, including Fox News, from the airwaves.

Get Our Weekly Newsletter and Get Smarter

Receive a weekly recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

We agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

We will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee on Monday announced a February 24 hearing, convened by one of its sub-committees, entitled “Fanning the Flames: Disinformation and Extremism in the Media.” Claiming that “the spread of disinformation and extremism by traditional news media presents a tangible and destabilizing threat,” the Committee argues: “Some broadcasters’ and cable networks’ increasing reliance on conspiracy theories and misleading or patently false information raises questions about their devotion to journalistic integrity.”

Democrats

Since when is it the role of the U.S. Government to arbitrate and enforce precepts of “journalistic integrity”? Unless you believe in the right of the government to regulate and control what the press says — a power which the First Amendment explicitly prohibits — how can anyone be comfortable with members of Congress arrogating unto themselves the power to dictate what media outlets are permitted to report and control how they discuss and analyze the news of the day?

But what House Democrats are doing here is far more insidious than what is revealed by that creepy official announcement. Two senior members of that Committee, Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Silicon-Valley) and Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-CA) also sent their own letters to seven of the nation’s largest cable providers — Comcast, AT&T, Spectrum, Dish, Verizon, Cox and Altice — as well as to digital distributors of cable news (Roku, Amazon, Apple, Google and Hulu) demanding to know, among other things, what those cable distributors did to prevent conservative “disinformation” prior to the election and after — disinformation, they said, that just so happened to be spread by the only conservative cable outlets: Fox, Newsmax and OANN.

In case there was any doubt about their true goal — coercing these cable providers to remove all cable networks that feature conservative voices, including Fox (just as their counterparts on that Committee want to ban right-wing voices from social media) — the House Democrats in their letter said explicitly what they are after: namely, removal of those conservative outlets by these cable providers:

Congresswoman Eshoo boasted on her official site about these efforts, lauding herself and McNerney for “urging 12 cable, satellite, and streaming TV companies to combat the spread of misinformation and requesting more information about their actions to address misinformation, disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies spread through channels they host.”

For the last four years, we were inundated with media messaging that Trump posed an unprecedented threat to press freedoms. The Washington Post even flamboyantly adopted a new motto to implicitly ratify that accusation (while claiming it was not Trump-specific). Other than the indictment of Julian Assange — which most Washington Democrats cheered — what did the Trump administration do in the way of attacking press freedoms that remotely compares to Democrats abusing their majoritarian power to force the removal of conservative cable outlets from the airwaves, just days after doing the same with dissident voices online?

There is not a peep of protest from any liberal journalists. Do any of the people who spent four years pretending to care so deeply about the vital role of press freedom have anything to say about this full frontal attack by the majority party in Washington on news outlets opposed to their political agenda and ideology?

Read: Democrats Pressure Major Service Providers to Censor Free Speech and Misinformation

Evidently not. While many conservative outlets are covering this story, it is difficult to find any liberal outlets writing about it at all. An article from The New York Times was one exception, though it largely attempted to justify these censorship efforts, with paragraph after paragraph purporting to demonstrate the dangerous misinformation spread by these channels. The only nods to the dangers of press freedoms in the article came from statements by Fox News and a GOP member of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Revealingly, these same two members of Congress who sent this threatening letter to cable providers said during the Trump years that freedom of the press must be safeguarded at all costs. “The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making laws that abridge the freedom of the press, and we cherish our country’s culture of free expression,” they intoned when writing to the FCC in 2019 to complain that Russian news outlets were concealing their affiliation with the Kremlin. “We’re not requesting any press censorship,” they assured the FCC under Trump. Yet they are clearly doing exactly that now.

In a statement he emailed to me and publicly posted, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr denounced the Democrats’ actions as a “marked departure from First Amendment norms.” He said “it is a chilling transgression of the free speech rights that every media outlet in this country enjoys.” In response to my inquiries, Commissioner Carr added in a separate statement to me:

The greatest threat to free speech in America today is not any law passed by the government—the First Amendment stands as a strong bulwark against that form of censorship by state action.  The threat comes in the form of legislating by letterhead.  Politicians have realized that they can silence the speech of those with different political viewpoints by public bullying.  The letter sent by two senior Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee to cable companies and other regulated entities, and the Committee’s own hearing this week on “disinformation in the media,” are the latest examples.  They are singling out selected newsrooms for their coverage of political events and sending a clear message that these media outlets will pay a price if they do not align their viewpoints with Democrat orthodoxy.  That is a chilling transgression of free speech and journalistic freedom.  No government official has any business inquiring about the ‘moral principles’ that guide a private entity’s decision about what news to carry.

Carr’s GOP colleague on the FCC, Commissioner Nathan Simington, similarly accused House Democrats of seeking to “intimidate into silence those who would distribute on their platforms disfavored points of view.”

The way Democrats justify this to themselves is important to consider. They do not, of course, explicitly acknowledge that they are engaged in authoritarian assaults on free speech and a free press. Not even the most despotic tyrants like to think of themselves in that way. All tyrants concoct theories and excuses to justify their censorship as noble and necessary.

Indeed, the justifying script Democrats are using here is the one most commonly employed by autocrats around the world to silence their critics. Those they seek to silence are not merely expressing a different view, but are dangerous. They are not merely advocating alternative ideologies but are destabilizing society with lies, fake news, and speech that deliberately incites violence, subversion and domestic terrorism.

In her boastful posting, Rep. Eshoo says her efforts targeting these cable outlets are necessary because “misinformation on TV has led to our current polluted information environment that radicalizes individuals to commit seditious acts and rejects public health best practices, among other issues in our public discourse.” This is the rationale invoked by virtually every repressive state to imprison journalists and ban media outlets.

The Democrats sound a great deal like the Egyptian regime of Gen. Abdel el-Sisi. Just two weeks ago, Sisi’s regime finally released an Al Jazeera journalist who had been imprisoned for four years based on accusations that he had “spread false news” and was guilty of “incitement against state institutions and broadcasting false news with the aim of spreading chaos.” Sound familiar? It should, since that is precisely what House Democrats are saying to ennoble their multi-pronged assault on free expression.

International Federation of Journalists, Feb. 5, 2021

Accusing one’s domestic opponents of being subversives and domestic terrorists is by far the most common way that despots on every continent justify their censorship and silencing campaigns of oppositional media outlets. In 2014, the French journalist Valeria Costa-Kostritsky warned in the Index on Censorship that anti-terrorism laws and accusations of promoting subversion were becoming the primary means which authoritarian states from Turkey and Jordan to Russia and the UAE use to justify the silencing of journalists:

Anti-terror legislation seems to be the perfect tool for a state seeking to crack down on opposition. “It’s so elusive. You can [see] anything as terrorist propaganda. There needn’t be any evidence of violence, any praise of violence. Plus, if you blame someone for having a connection with the [Kurdistan Workers’ Party] the public buys that argument easily, especially in a country that is suffering from terrorism, as Turkey is,” said Sevgi Akarçeşme, former editor-in-chief of Turkey’s Today’s Zaman (the English-language edition of daily Zaman), who had her newspaper taken over by the government in March 2016.

A similar means used by repressive governments to silence disfavored media outlets is to claim they are promoting “extremism.” As Costa-Kostritsky detailed:

There’s another word one can use to browse through reports published on the [Mapping Media Freedom] map: “extremism”. Anti-extremism legislation is used to intimidate journalists in post-Soviet countries, particularly in Russia. On the map, of the 35 incidents flagged with “extremism”, 11 took place in Russia, and seven in Crimea, others include Belgium, Italy, Hungary, France and Spain. Five reports connecting the media to “extremism” took place during the first half of 2016. They include website closures and journalists being put on a list of extremists. In Russia, most cases using anti-extremism legislations against journalists happen via Roskomnadzor, the national media regulator.

When China arrests journalists it typically justifies its actions by accusing them of fomenting extremism that jeopardizes national security.

And accusing journalists of spreading “fake news” — always a dangerously vague term from its inception — is equally commonplace when government authorities want to silence media outlets. The Washington Post reported that “as 2019 draws to a close, there are 30 journalists in jail worldwide on charges of ‘false news’ — or, as it’s also called these days, ‘fake news.’” In sum:

It has now become commonplace to throw around fake-news accusations in the United States. But in other countries around the world — like Egypt, Turkey, Somalia and Cameroon — such charges can have very chilling and stifling impacts on the press, according to an annual report by the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists.

In Egypt — where General-turned-President Abdel Fatah al-Sissi has been overseeing a crackdown that human rights groups say is harsher than any before — there are 21 journalists in jail for allegedly publishing “false news,” according to the CPJ’s data. In practice, press freedom advocates say, these charges stem from a simple fact: The journalists published news that Sisi didn’t like.

In a passage that the Post would only publish about foreign countries but never about House Democrats, even though it now applies equally, they observed: “There is a serious global problem of disinformation spreading online and sowing distrust and sectarianism. The problem, say press advocates, is that the laws regulating fake news all too often are a means of stifling the media rather than fostering a more transparent environment online.”

 

The Washington Post, Dec. 12, 2019

This framework is hardly rare in the west either. When the Obama administration collaborated with the UK Government in 2013 to detain my husband David Miranda at Heathrow Airport in connection with the work he was doing in the Snowden reporting, they cited an anti-terrorism law to justify his detention, and repeatedly threatened to prosecute him for terrorism if he did not cooperate by providing all of his passwords to them. He ultimately prevailed in his lawsuit against the U.K. Government on the ground that it constitutes an illegal assault on press freedoms and human rights to abuse anti-terrorism frameworks to intimidate or silence journalists.

Justifying the silencing of journalists by accusing them of inciting domestic terrorism and extremism is now the most common means used globally for censorsing the press. The Committee to Protect Journalists in 2013 said they had “tracked a significant rise in journalist imprisonments.” The culprit, said the group, was “the expansion of anti-terrorism and national security laws worldwide” after the 9/11 attack, which had been repeatedly abused to criminalize media outlets. “The number of journalists jailed worldwide hit 232 in 2012, 132 of whom were held on anti-terror or other national security charges.” In sum: “CPJ’s analysis has found that governments have exploited these laws to silence critical journalists.”

Written by Glenn Greenwald, Substack

This article was originally published on Greenwald.Substack.com. Read the original article.

ThinkCivics Newswire

ThinkCivics researches, examines, and reports on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption.

thinkcivics.com
Tags: DemocratsFirst AmendmentPress

Related Posts

White House Putting Police Oversight Commission on Hold to Pursue Legislation: Susan Rice

White House Putting Police Oversight Commission on Hold to Pursue Legislation: Susan Rice

April 12, 2021
Top CEOs Met to Discuss Voting Laws Deemed Discriminatory, Limiting

Top CEOs Met to Discuss Voting Laws Deemed Discriminatory, Limiting

April 12, 2021

Putting Biden’s Gun Control Claims To The Truth Test

April 12, 2021

Businesses Taking Political Positions Further Divide The Nation

April 12, 2021
Load More
Next Post
Do Big Tech Companies Exploit Our Data?

Do Big Tech Companies Exploit Our Data?

King Of Saudi Arabia Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud Visits China

President Biden Addresses King of Saudi Arabia about Human Rights Violations

Senate Budget Committee Holds Hearing On Poverty Wages At Corporations

Bipartisan senators introduce bill to strip Biden of war powers

Staff Editorials

Governor Brian Kemp Tours Delta Mass Vaccination Site
Culture & Society

Georgia Corporations Cave to Activists On Voter ID Law. Republicans Hit Back Where It Hurts.

by Michael Price, MPA
April 9, 2021
Close Up Of Boxing Gloves
News & Politics

Now Is The Time for America to Make Room for a Third-Party. Voters Deserve Better!

by Samantha DeTurk
April 5, 2021
Vaccine Passports Pose Privacy and Discrimination Concerns Says Health Experts and Digital Privacy Advocates
Health & Science

Vaccine Passports Pose Privacy and Discrimination Concerns Says Health Experts and Digital Privacy Advocates

by Michael Price, MPA
March 29, 2021
Rep. Jackie Speier, House Speaker Pelosi And Congressional Democrats Mark Vote On The Equal Rights Amendment Ratification
Culture & Society

The Left Pushes for Ratification of the ERA with President Biden’s Support

by Josh Herrington
March 25, 2021
The Bipartisan ‘Endless Frontier Act’ Increases Tech Research Spending to $100bn Annually to Outcompete Communist China
Technology

The Bipartisan ‘Endless Frontier Act’ Increases Tech Research Spending to $100bn Annually to Outcompete Communist China

by Keefer Novik
March 24, 2021

Recommended

ISRAEL-US-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY-DEFENCE

Will the US Protect Gulf Bases with Iron Dome?

3 months ago
PRO Act Strengthens Labor Unions, Seeks to Abolish Right-to-Work Laws

PRO Act Strengthens Labor Unions, Seeks to Abolish Right-to-Work Laws

3 weeks ago
Biden Creating Commission to Study Expanding the Supreme Court

Biden Creating Commission to Study Expanding the Supreme Court

3 days ago
How Lack of Civic Knowledge is Destroying American Democracy

How Lack of Civic Knowledge is Destroying American Democracy

3 months ago

Categories

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World
No Result
View All Result

Highlights

The third round of stimulus checks helped, but millions of Americans are still struggling

Putting Biden’s Gun Control Claims To The Truth Test

Businesses Taking Political Positions Further Divide The Nation

Amazon’s Twitch Bans Users Based on Undisclosed ‘Hate Group’ List

‘Critical Race Theory’ Being Taught at US Army’s West Point: Congressman

As protesters on left and right target public servants at home, one city pushes back

What's New

White House Putting Police Oversight Commission on Hold to Pursue Legislation: Susan Rice
News & Politics

White House Putting Police Oversight Commission on Hold to Pursue Legislation: Susan Rice

by ThinkCivics Newswire
April 12, 2021
0

Head of Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, Susan Rice, said the White House has suspended its plans to...

Biden says he is ‘prepared to negotiate’ scope of infrastructure plan and how to pay for it

Biden says he is ‘prepared to negotiate’ scope of infrastructure plan and how to pay for it

April 12, 2021
Top CEOs Met to Discuss Voting Laws Deemed Discriminatory, Limiting

Top CEOs Met to Discuss Voting Laws Deemed Discriminatory, Limiting

April 12, 2021
The third round of stimulus checks helped, but millions of Americans are still struggling

The third round of stimulus checks helped, but millions of Americans are still struggling

April 12, 2021
Putting Biden’s Gun Control Claims To The Truth Test

Putting Biden’s Gun Control Claims To The Truth Test

April 12, 2021
Facebook Twitter Instagram RSS

Follow us on social media:

About ThinkCivics

We research, examine, and report on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption. Our reports are not presented in confusing academic or political language, we speak Main Street English.

Recent News

  • White House Putting Police Oversight Commission on Hold to Pursue Legislation: Susan Rice
  • Biden says he is ‘prepared to negotiate’ scope of infrastructure plan and how to pay for it
  • Top CEOs Met to Discuss Voting Laws Deemed Discriminatory, Limiting

Category

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Health & Science
  • News & Politics
  • Religion
  • Technology
  • World

© 2021 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Login
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • ThinkCivics Plus
  • Contribute

© 2021 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.