Nevada’s governor on Friday signed a bill that aims to make the state the first presidential primary, in an ongoing battle with other states that hold early votes.
Assembly Bill 126 (pdf) requires the primary during a presidential election year be held in Nevada on the second to last Tuesday in January.
The law “establishes Nevada as the first in the Nation presidential primary and this brings me great pride as the diversity and culture found in the people of the great State of Nevada undoubtedly represents the demographical composition of who we are as a Nation,” Gov. Steve Sisolak, a Democrat, said after signing the bill in a ceremony.
The bill was passed by the Nevada Assembly last month 30–11 and by the Nevada Senate, also in May, 15–6.
New Hampshire state law dictates that presidential primary elections shall be held on a date that is a week or more before the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election.
“The purpose of this section is to protect the tradition of the New Hampshire first-in-the-nation presidential primary,” the law states.
Iowa code, meanwhile, states that its caucuses, or version of the primaries, shall be held at least eight days earlier than any other scheduled caucus or primary for the presidential election.
In 2020, Iowa held its caucus on Feb. 3 and New Hampshire held its primary on Feb. 11, followed 11 days later by Nevada.
Nevada Assemblywoman Brittany Miller, a Democrat who was one of the new bill’s primary sponsors, said Friday that the legislation “switches us from a presidential caucus to a primary … but, more importantly, makes our incredibly diverse state FIRST IN THE NATION!”
“That means, you won’t be waiting for Iowa and New Hampshire anymore, it’s all eyes on Nevada!” she wrote on Facebook.
But the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee would have to sign off on Nevada’s leapfrog attempt, and neither have committed to doing so.
In a recent statement, Jaime Harrison, chair of the Democrat committee, said that “we are going to continue to let the process play out, as it does every four years, and look forward to hearing the insight and recommendations from all interested parties on the 2020 reforms, and on the 2024 calendar at the appropriate time in the process.”
Ronna McDaniel, the Republican committee chair, has indicated the GOP isn’t interested in switching the primary order.
Earlier this week, Republican Party of Iowa Chairman Jeff Kaufmann, Republican Party of New Hampshire Chairman Stephen Stepanek, Nevada Republican Party Chairman Michael J. McDonald, and South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Drew McKissick said in a joint statement that “we want to make clear that we stand together in protecting the presidential nominating schedule as it has existed for many years.”
“Our alliance is strong and we will continue to work together to preserve this historic process,” they added.
Asked whether President Joe Biden, as the most powerful Democrat in the nation, supported switching the primary order, White House press secretary Jen Psaki this week declined to answer.
“I certainly understand the interest, but I’m not going to weigh in on the order of a presidential primary contests [sic] from here,” she told reporters in Washington.
ThinkCivics researches, examines, and reports on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption.