ThinkCivics News
An educated citizenry is a vital requisite
for our survival as a free people.
Join ThinkCivics+
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Health
  • US News
  • Faith
  • Science & Tech
  • World News
Join ThinkCivics+
No Result
View All Result
ThinkCivics News
Join TC+
Home

Study: Lockdowns Had Largest Impact in Destroying Economic Activity

A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that "enforcement of mandatory restrictions" appears to have driven the collapse of sales in California.

ThinkCivics Newswire by ThinkCivics Newswire
March 22, 2021
in Economy
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0
0
Study: Lockdowns Had Largest Impact in Destroying Economic Activity

Image Credit: Pixabay

The world may be nearing the end of the coronavirus pandemic (at least we can hope), but the post mortems are just beginning.

A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found important correlations between sales losses and lockdowns across counties in California.

Economists Robert W. Fairlie and Frank M. Fossen used state data from all taxable sales in California during the first two quarters of 2020, finding a drop of $152 billion in the second quarter alone, a 17.5 percent decline from the previous quarter.

Not all businesses experienced losses, of course. Some businesses deemed “essential” saw gains, such as pharmacies, liquor stores, supermarkets, agriculture, and building material & garden equipment stores.

Many economic sectors were not so lucky, the authors found.

Leading the way in sales losses was the accommodation sector (91 percent), followed by bars (86 percent). Entertainment venues saw sales drop 83 percent, while full-service restaurants saw a decline of 61 percent.

“Small shops selling Gifts and Souvenirs, Clothing, or Books also experienced large losses in the second quarter of 2020,” the authors concluded..

None of these results are particularly surprising. But the authors also identified something else important. Namely, they found that the decline in sales during the pandemic stemmed primarily from government lockdowns and other restrictions, not voluntary social distancing.

“The results (of our research) suggest that local implementation and enforcement of lockdown restrictions and voluntary behavioral responses as reactions to the perceived local COVID-19 spread both played a role,” the economists state, “but enforcement of mandatory restrictions may have had a larger impact on sales losses.”

Did the Virus Kill the Economy or Government?

There’s no question the US experienced an economic recession unlike any it had ever seen before, highlighted by a 33 percent GDP drop and 22 million jobs lost.

“The economic crisis is unprecedented in its scale,” Brookings Institution scholars wrote in a September paper, “the pandemic has created a demand shock, a supply shock, and a financial shock all at once.”

Few would deny the first claim—that the economic crisis is unprecedented in scale—but the second half contains a point of contention? Did “the pandemic” create the economic destruction or the collective response to the pandemic?

For months, the New York Times and others have implied it was the former.

“It will take years for the global economy to recover from the jobs taken away by the pandemic,” the Times reported in July.

Taken away by the pandemic. Numerous other examples by the Times and other media can be found espousing similar language.

This is not a question of simple semantics. Whether the greatest economic collapse in modern history was caused by a virus or the government’s response to the virus is not an inconsequential distinction. So did the pandemic take jobs away?

A recent Washington Post article says yes.

“…pandemic-related economic research shows the shutdowns aren’t killing jobs,” data journalist Andrew Vann Dam wrote, “the virus is.”

Vann Dam cites research from Indiana Indiana University economists Sumedha Gupta, Kosali Simon, and Coady Wing that analyzed dozens of pandemic and social distancing studies.

“Most of the economic damage we’ve seen is produced by people’s reaction to the virus,” Wing said. “Social distancing policies mattered, too, but they were layered on top of a major change in personal behavior.”

In this scenario, lockdowns weren’t the destroyer of economies. Fear and social distancing were.

Vann Damm also cites a study by economists Chad Syverson and Austan Goolsbee of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business who compared cell phone data to areas locked down to areas that were not.

“Business fell by more than half (53 percent) regardless of whether a place shut down, as people everywhere were trying to not to leave their homes,” Vann Dam writes.

This conclusion would seem to run counter to evidence from the NBER paper, which suggested government restrictions were primarily responsible for the economic damage.

Who’s Right?

Over the last year, the US economy and most others around the world were devastated. Who is ultimately held responsible for that destruction is not a trivial matter.

For nearly nine months, we’ve pointed out many of the unintended consequences of government lockdowns, which have included surging global poverty, mass job loss and business closures, spikes in depression and suicide, excess deaths, and other adverse social consequences..

As mentioned above, however, the Post would have you believe the damage was not the result of lockdowns.

“Governors shutdowns did not cause the pandemic jobs crisis,” the headline declares.

To arrive at this claim the paper relies primarily on two key points: 1) humans were social distancing even in the absence of mandatory restrictions, which resulted in a decline in economic activity; 2) jobs data do not show a wide divide between blue states and red states.

The first point is a non sequitur. It’s no revelation that people were social distancing and avoiding travel in the absence of mandatory restrictions. This fact was pointed out in many FEE articles, and it was used to demonstrate that lockdowns weren’t necessary because people were voluntarily modifying their behavior to lower the risk of exposure to a strange and deadly virus.

It simply does not follow that because people voluntarily adjusted their behavior, such actions would result in similar economic consequences. The foot traffic data the Post cites offers no clues about how humans prioritized travel or made purchases; it just shows they traveled less. This is a far cry from the research provided by Fairlie and Fossen, which analyzed the actual sales data of “essential” and “non-essential” businesses, and found mandatory restrictions had a much larger impact on sales losses.

The second point the Post provides is equally weak.

Vann Dam notes that, on average, red states have recovered faster than blue states. But he correctly notes that “even the simplest analysis shows job losses don’t depend solely on the governor’s party. Some red states struggled, some blue states thrived.”

One reason for this, he notes, is that many Republican-led states also enforced lockdowns. Despite this admission, Vann Dam proceeds to compare states based on red state and blue state criteria, offering numerous charts exploring differences in rural and urban areas.

This thoroughly undermines the claims that the lockdowns are only a minor factor in economic destruction, and that the virus itself is the real culprit.

But for the reasons Van Damm states, comparing red states and blue states doesn’t tell us very much. A far more helpful analysis would compare states with the most restrictive COVID policies with the states with the least restrictive policies. And that data is readily available, though you’ll not find it in the Post’s story—perhaps because the conclusion this data set reaches.

Data from Oxford University and the US Bureau of Labor and Statistics show that states with the most restrictive policies had substantially more unemployment than states with the least restrictive policies.

The governors of the most restrictive states did achieve one thing with all their interventions, though: unemployment nearly 2X that seen in the least restrictive states. pic.twitter.com/B6wwf7gna4

— PLC (@Humble_Analysis) December 21, 2020

Nor is this the only evidence that suggests lockdowns, not the virus, were the primary economic destructor. A brief look at history shows there was no massive economic collapse in previous pandemics that were similarly deadly (or more deadly).

Early in 2020 Ryan McMaken of the Mises Institute pointed out that the 2020 pandemic was starkly different from the pandemics of 1918 and 1957-58, both of which were incredibly deadly.

“Yet we will see that neither produced economic damage on a scale we now see as a result of the government-mandated lockdowns,” McMaken observed. “This thoroughly undermines the claims that the lockdowns are only a minor factor in economic destruction, and that the virus itself is the real culprit.”

The Horror of a Command Economy

Last June, I observed that in their zeal to use force to protect humans from a deadly virus, “experts” may have subjected Americans to a blunder greater than any since the Iraq War.

Following that blunder, experts and defenders of the conflict spent years attempting to deny they were actually wrong. The lockdowns, which have been shown to be far less effective at protecting lives than destroying economies, will be no different.

Read: Robinhood Rebellion Against the Wealthy Spotlights the Wealth Gap

The horror of a command economy is not that officials will make mistakes, but that those mistakes will never be acknowledged or corrected.

David Mamet, the critically acclaimed playwright and screenwriter, observed in a November Wall Street Journal article that history is replete with examples of central planners who ruined economies through coercive policies.

The Holdomor. The Bengal Famine. Cambodia’s “killing fields.” Mao’s Great Leap Forward. Trofim Lysenko’s mad war on genetic science.

As horrifying as many of these examples are, their catastrophic results don’t capture the full terror of collectivism.

“The horror of a command economy is not that officials will make mistakes,” Mamet observed, “but that those mistakes will never be acknowledged or corrected.”

This is why the research in the NBER paper—which is based on actual state revenue data, not foot traffic at businesses—is so important.

If we are to avoid in the future the pain, suffering, and destruction experienced in 2020—pain which many of us still carry today—we must be honest about its causes.

Jon Miltimore

Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune.

Bylines: Newsweek, The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

ThinkCivics Newswire

ThinkCivics researches, examines, and reports on issues that matter most. We deliver explanative, fearless, and insightful analysis for public consumption.

thinkcivics.com
Tags: Academic PapersCovid-19David MametEconomicsNBEROxfordRecessionUnemployment

Related Posts

Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States

Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States

May 24, 2022
This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect

This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect

May 23, 2022

Is Trump A Modern Day Nostradamus? Watch His Prediction Of What Would Happen If Biden Won

May 23, 2022

U.S. economy may outpace China’s this year for the first time in nearly 50 years

May 21, 2022
Load More
Next Post
marijuana symbol with legal text in neon lights

Could Federal Cannabis Legalization Aid in Solving the Opioid Crisis?

Composite Image By FEE | Image Credit Gage Skidmore, Flickr/WikiMedia Commons

The Cancel Culture Mob Got Gina Carano and Is Eyeing Fox News. Here’s Why It’s Wrong.

President Biden Delivers Remarks On The Coup In Burma

How Concerned is President Biden with Israel and the Middle East?

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

  • BREAKING: State Farm Exec Apologizes to Angry Agents, Says ‘We Made a Mistake With Our Involvement’ With GenderCool

    BREAKING: State Farm Exec Apologizes to Angry Agents, Says ‘We Made a Mistake With Our Involvement’ With GenderCool

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Obamacare ‘Time-Bomb’ Puts Democrats in Further Peril Heading Into the Midterms

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • FBI Agent at Sussmann Trial Just Dropped a Bomb About an Ongoing Investigation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Punks Attempt Another Smash and Grab, Pick Jewelry Store Where Employees Were Itching For A Fight

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Biden Loses It, Snaps at a Reporter in Brussels, May Have Just Leaked Critical Information

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation

by The Federalist
May 19, 2022
0
Handwritten Notes From 2017 Show FBI Agents Mislead DOJ On The Trump-Russia Investigation
National Security

Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann is currently on trial for lying to the FBI about his role in pushing...

Read more

Jankowicz Got The Boot, But Biden’s ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Hired Replacements Are WORST

by ThinkCivics Newswire
May 19, 2022
0
Jankowicz Got The Boot, But Biden’s ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Hired Replacements Are WORST
National Security

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) hired the co-author of the PATRIOT Act, arguably the harshest crackdown on civil liberties...

Read more

MSNBC Guests Want GOP Labeled ‘Domestic Terror Party,’ Jail Time For Having The Wrong Opinions

by The Political Insider
May 19, 2022
0
MSNBC Guests Want GOP Labeled ‘Domestic Terror Party,’ Jail Time For Having The Wrong Opinions
National Security

We all know that Democrats and the left love to operate on the premise of “never let a good crisis...

Read more

Incredible Video: George W. Bush Accidentally Condemns ‘Unjustified and Brutal Invasion of Iraq’

by The Political Insider
May 19, 2022
0
Incredible Video: George W. Bush Accidentally Condemns ‘Unjustified and Brutal Invasion of Iraq’
National Security

George W. Bush committed a Freudian slip so brutal they may have to rename the phenomenon after him. The former...

Read more
Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States
Economy

Watch: Davos Elites Warn “Painful Global Transition” Should Not Be Resisted By Nation-States

by Zero Hedge
May 24, 2022
0

As World Economic Forum head Klaus Schwab proclaimed that “the future is built by us” at the opening of the...

Read more
This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect
Economy

This Year’s World Economic Forum in Davos Is as Disturbing as You’d Expect

by RedState
May 23, 2022
0

It’s the time of year again when thousands of the world’s most powerful and wealthy people gather in Davos, Switzerland...

Read more
Is Trump A Modern Day Nostradamus? Watch His Prediction Of What Would Happen If Biden Won
Economy

Is Trump A Modern Day Nostradamus? Watch His Prediction Of What Would Happen If Biden Won

by The Political Insider
May 23, 2022
0

President Trump is many things, to friend and foe alike. Is being a modern day Nostradamus among them? At least...

Read more
U.S. economy may outpace China’s this year for the first time in nearly 50 years
Economy

U.S. economy may outpace China’s this year for the first time in nearly 50 years

by Just the News
May 21, 2022
0

The growth of the U.S. economy is set to outpace that of China's for the first time in nearly five...

Read more
Facebook Twitter RSS

Brilliantly

SAFE!

thinkcivics.com

Content & Links

Verified by Sur.ly

2022

Recent News

  • Mike Rowe Says Feds Revoked His Filming Permit, Received Call Claiming It Was Pulled For His ‘Personal Politics’
  • Candace Owens SCORCHES Bias Media for Labeling Her a Russian Propagandist
  • US Government Admits It Used Schools As Tool To Erase Culture, Seize Native American Land: Report

Category

  • Culture & Society
  • Economy
  • Editorials
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Faith
  • Health
  • Immigration
  • Military
  • National Security
  • Politics
  • Science & Tech
  • US News
  • Videos
  • World News

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Login
  • Sign Up
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Contact Us
  • Join
  • Contribute

© 2022 ThinkCivics Media. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.